Facebook Twitter LinkedIn YouTube Menu Search Arrow Right Arrow Left Arrow Down Arrow Up Home Arrow Next Arrow Previous RSS Icon Calendar Icon Warning Icon

Filter the results

  • Enter one or more words to find resources containing any of the words entered
  • Enter words or phrases between " " to find exact match

Resource Library

Article

Repair or Replace? Research reveals criteria end users consider

  • November 2015
  • Number of views: 5440
  • Article rating: No rating

Jerry Peerbolte
J. Peerbolte & Associates
Fort Smith, Arkansas

How do end users make repair or replace decisions for failed electric motors?  This question was explored in EASA’s 2014 end-user customer research study. It was also examined in the earlier 2003 and 2008 research projects providing the opportunity to determine if attitudes and practices have changed over time.

In the most recent study, half of the end users surveyed reported a policy of automatically replacing motors un­der a specified horsepower rating. The specific rating ranged from as low as 1 hp to over 200 hp, with the median rating of 10 hp.  

Other criteria important to end us­ers is included in Chart 1.

Image

Reviewing these replies, it is clear that most end-users chose to make their repair/replace decisions con­sidering the individual circumstances surrounding that particular motor, as well as the cost of repair, the motor’s age, and the recommendation from their EASA service center.

As to the cost of repair, nearly two-thirds of the end users reported that they do have a general “rule-of-thumb” as far as how much they are willing to pay for a repair compared to the price of a new replacement motor. On aver­age, end-users are willing to spend up to 56% of the cost of a new motor for repair of the failed one. If the repair cost exceeds that amount, then they may be more inclined to replace. Comparing this percentage to earlier EASA research studies, end-users reported 61% in 2003 and 53% in 2008, suggesting a slight trend away from repair.  

Finally, end users generally do not make use of a formal motor repair specification, with less than 30% re­porting use of one. See Chart 2. 

Image

This suggests that EASAns could strengthen their end-user relation­ships by assisting customers with the development of an appropriate speci­fication (e.g., ANSI/EASA AR100). This process would allow EASAns the opportunity to illustrate the value of a quality motor repair. 



Rate this article:
No rating
Print


PREVIOUS ITEM

Getting The Most From Your Electric Motors

Getting The Most From Your Electric Motors - coverThis 40-page booklet provides great advice for obtaining the longest, most efficient and cost-effective operation from general and definite purpose electric motors.

This booklet covers topics such as:

  • Installation, startup and baseline information
  • Operational monitoring and maintenance
  • Motor and baseline installation data
  • How to read a motor nameplate
  • Motor storage recommendations

LEARN MORE AND DOWNLOAD MÁS INFORMACIÓN Y DESCARGAR BUY PRINTED COPIES

READ MORE ABOUT THE FEATURES AND BENEFITS

EASA/AEMT Rewind Study

EASA Rewind Study cover

The Effect of Repair/Rewinding on Premium Efficiency/IE3 Motors
Tests prove Premium Efficiency/IE3 Motors can be rewound without degrading efficiency.

DOWNLOAD THE FULL RESULTS

ANSI/EASA AR100-2020

ANSI/EASA AR100-2015 cover

Recommended Practice for the Repair of Rotating Electrical Apparatus
This is a must-have guide to the repair of rotating electrical machines. Its purpose is to establish recommended practices in each step of the rotating electrical apparatus rewinding and rebuilding processes.

DOWNLOAD - ENGLISH

DESCARGAR - ESPAÑOL

EASA Technical Manual

EASA Technical Manual cover

Revised May 2024
The EASA Technical Manual is the association's definitive and most complete publication. It's available FREE to members in an online format. Members can also download PDFs of the entire manual or individual sections.

VIEW & DOWNLOAD